📢 Live Market News: Loading news...

Mass data deletion by governments is accelerating.

 

Opinion: Phil Mataras, Founder and CEO of A.IO

Let’s stop pretending that the data only disappear. no. It was deleted and buried and is often deliberately done.

Every time a new power administration consumes, priorities are reformulated. This is expected, but what is unacceptable is the quiet disappearance coordinated for general information. It can already be seen, especially in the United States, and quickly you should remove anyone who is interested in the truth.

From public health information panels to economic indicators, full areas of data are transferred without internet connection without a press statement or an explanation. He just went. This is not home management or protection; Historical review occurs in real time.

Digital memory fragility

The Internet was supposed to be a great goal – the vast general professor’s book of knowledge used for the greatest good – but this ideal was not translated into reality. Instead, it was extracted in a digital mirage. Vast appearance, but fragile.

When web sites disappear, the archives are folded, or the files are quietly pulled … there is no library secretary for the request, there is no phone number to call it, and it usually does not explain the reason. The centralization of information has become the biggest weakness – a system designed to rest rather than always.

Let’s not intoxication: This is dangerous. The authority cannot be held accountable if there is no access to its actions, and in this way, justice, policy and reform cannot be pursued if the data you support is already deleted.

The facts do not have authority, but in the current system, it may also come with the expiration date.

Consider World War II and the Holocaust – the terror that was silent and gaps in the evidence that allowed evils to crawl through cracks. If the tools available today exist after that – tools to record, store and distribute them without control – how much has changed?

He moved to 2021, when she forced independent news such as Apple Daily on the Internet within hours in Hong Kong. The 26 -year -old press archive has become almost overnight, as the servers were closed and digital records were wiped from hand. Hope was renewed after electronic activists began supporting articles on permanent, permanent control.

He rapidly advanced today in Spain, and we see the same problem after years. ISPS prohibits entire parts of the Internet under pressure from corporate sports interests – there is no vote, no public conversation, just controlled by the legal language.

Do not mistake silence for peace. Silence is control.

Maintaining general data

Erasing is no longer a raw work of destruction. It is a quiet, legal and bureaucratic process that has been sharpened over the decades. While the threat of maintaining general data is real, as well as responses.

recently: The United States government. Establish artificial intelligence policies through agencies

Non -profit initiatives, such as the Internet archive, have prompted billions of web pages calmly over the years, and effective protection against digital decay. These types of open source archiving efforts work independently of governments because no single administration should carry the keys to the general registry.

Blockchain data storage solutions also provide alternative and controlled alternative storage solutions-unlike dominant cloud service providers today, which allow and even work to delete and manipulate data.

Each deleted article, every missing data collection and every broken link is a chisel that is transferred to the basis of general reality. Without data, the truth becomes subjective. When the truth is subjective, the force lasts (and the highest voice).

The loss of information is the loss of history, and while there are solutions, it is not the goal of this article. This is not a commercial advertisement – this is a warning.

Maintaining data as rebellion

Preserving general data is no longer a technical challenge – it is a civil commitment. Not everyone can formulate legislation or lead protest movements, but everyone can save a copy. For every archive and every witness, there is protection for the truth, not only for what is happening but, the most important thing, what was.

George Orwell wrote, “It is a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.” It was a fantasy, but today, it is a strategy because the future is not based on dreams – it is based on records.

When the general memory is hosted on the systems that can be liberated, purchased or removed, the remainder is not a date – it is a copy of history, composed by the last person in power position. This is the real danger. It is not misleading information but “other than information: a vacuum where a list remains only empty – where accountability must be found.

The next choice is simple: Let the deletion continue or struggle for permanence and truth.

The record must exceed the system, and the facts should exceed the people they fear. Without this, the current generations will not lose its history only; They will also lose their future.

Opinion: Phil Mataras, founder and director of the CEO of Ar.io.

This article is intended for general information purposes and does not aim to be and should not be considered legal or investment advice. The opinions, ideas and opinions expressed here are alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

 

 

CATEGORIES

JOIN NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Ready to get started, Get our Newsletter and join the Community!

More article.

Learn about new features from frequently asked question.